');

Sonoembrology normal and abnormal early pregnancy scans

1 Essential Queries for Early Pregnancy Ultrasound
2: Identifying Pregnancy Loss – When Things Don’t Go Right
3: Vascular Concerns – Enhanced Myometrial Vascularity (EMV) vs.         Arteriovenous Malformation (AVM)
4: Gestational Trophoblastic Disease (GTD) – When the Placenta            Misbehaves 
5: Conclusion – Key Insights for Everyday Practice
6.Final Note

Sat Aug 30, 2025

Sonoembrology normal and abnormal early pregnancy scans

"Understanding Early Pregnancy – The Essentials

1 Essential Queries for Early Pregnancy Ultrasound
Before we explore atypical pregnancies, let’s address four critical inquiries:
🔹 Is the pregnancy located within the uterus or outside of it? (No one wants to go on a                  “pregnancy hunt” 😅)
🔹 Is the pregnancy progressing or not? (A matter of joy or sorrow?)
🔹 Is it a single fetus or more? (The more, the merrier?)
🔹 Are there any complications present? (Such as subchorionic hematomas, unusual growth patterns, or concerning vascularity)

2: Identifying Pregnancy Loss – When Things Don’t Go Right
The Three “Whoops” of Early Pregnancy Loss
A. Anembryonic Pregnancy (Blighted Ovum)
Definition:
A gestational sac appears, but there’s no embryo (Mother Nature’s way of saying, “Forget it”
Sonographic Indicators:

✔ MSD ≥ 25 mm without a fetal pole.
 ✔ Absence of yolk sac in follow-up scans
B. Embryonic Demise (Missed Miscarriage)
Definition:
An embryo develops but ceases to grow, with no heartbeat detected.
Sonographic Indicators:
✔ CRL ≥ 7 mm with no fetal heartbeat → ☠ Confirmed embryonic loss

 ✔ Sac shows no growth after 2 weeks → Non-viable pregnancy
C. Subchorionic Hematoma (SCH)
Definition: Blood accumulates between the chorion and the uterine wall, posing a potential miscarriage risk
         SCH Size and Management           Miscarriage Risk:
  • <25% of sac circumference: Low risk, likely resolves on its own
  •  25-50% of sac circumference: Moderate risk, requires close monitoring 
  • >50% of sac circumference:Picture a traffic light in the uterus – is it orderly or chaotic?        High risk, needs careful oversight 
Management:
 ✔ Small SCH? → Reassure and plan for a follow-up.

Large SCH? → Close monitoring advised, recommend pelvic rest.
3: Vascular Concerns – Enhanced Myometrial Vascularity (EMV) vs. Arteriovenous Malformation (AVM)
Picture a traffic light in the uterus – is it orderly or chaotic?
Enhanced Myometrial Vascularity (EMV) – The Overzealous Blood Supply

Cause:

  • Occurs due to retained products of conception (RPOC).
  • The uterus continues to supply blood to absent placental tissue.

Sonographic Traits:
Increased blood flow in the myometrium.
 ✔ Color Doppler displays multiple low-resistance vessels.
 ✔ PSV may be elevated (>50 cm/s), but this isn’t the primary distinguishing factor.
Management:
Mild cases? → Expectant management.
 ✔ Ongoing bleeding? → D&C, preferably hysteroscopy-guided.
 ✔ Severe bleeding? → Uterine tamponade, UAE as a last resort!


Arteriovenous Malformation (AVM) – The Congested Uterus
Cause:
  • A congenital defect where arteries and veins connect directly (no capillaries                        involved!).
  • Not related to pregnancy or RPOC.
    Sonographic Traits:
    ✔ Turbulent, chaotic Doppler flow (artery flows directly into vein).
     ✔ Persistent flow even after RPOC removal.
     ✔ Some cases show very high PSV (>150 cm/s).
    Management:
    ✔ D&C is strictly prohibited! 🚫 (Could trigger severe bleeding!)
     ✔ Interventional radiology for embolization or surgical ligation.

    Differentiating EMV from AVM:

    Feature Enhanced Myometrial Vascularity (EMV) Arteriovenous Malformation (AVM)
    Cause Retained products of conception (RPOC) Congenital vascular anomaly
    Location Always within the uterus (post-pregnancy) Can occur anywhere in the body
    Doppler Flow Continuous placental blood supply Direct artery-to-vein shunting
    PSV Can exceed 50 cm/s but resolves Exceeds 150 cm/s, does not resolve
    Treatment Resolves post-RPOC removal Requires embolization or surgery

    4: Gestational Trophoblastic Disease (GTD) – When the Placenta Misbehaves

Instead of welcoming a baby, you get a placenta dominating the uterus.
Complete vs. Partial Molar Pregnancy:

Feature Complete Mole Partial Mole
Genetics 46, XY (Only paternal material) Triploid (69, XXY)
Fetal Parts? ❌ No Yes (but abnormal)
Ultrasound Findings "Snowstorm" echogenic mass "Swiss cheese" placenta
hCG Levels Extremely high Moderately elevated
Risk of Malignancy? 15-20% 0.5-5%

Management:
✔ Perform D&C with ongoing beta-hCG monitoring.
✔ Watch for signs of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia (GTN).

5: Conclusion – Key Insights for Everyday Practice
Experiencing first trimester bleeding? Always rule out viable pregnancy, miscarriage, or              molar pregnancy.
 ✅ EMV vs. AVM? Pay attention to Doppler flow patterns, persistence post-RPOC removal,                 and PSV!

 ✅ Blighted ovum? MSD ≥ 25 mm without fetal pole = No Hope!
 ✅ Missed miscarriage? CRL ≥ 7 mm with no heartbeat = Time to acknowledge loss.
 ✅ Complete vs. Partial Mole? Snowstorm indicates Complete; Swiss cheese indicates Partial.

Final Note: 

Exercise caution before labeling a pregnancy as "failed." Properly differentiate vascular anomalies to prevent unnecessary embolization. When uncertainty arises, it’s best to follow up because "first, do no harm."